Rightly Dividing Scripture - Paul for the Gentiles and Peter for the Jews?
I once heard this: " Peter was only the head Apostle for the Jews, and Paul was the Apostle for the Gentiles ." Noting that most Christians in the US would be considered “Gentiles”, the person summarized that, therefore, “ Paul’s writings are the most important ones for us, and Peter’s writings are not required ”. There was also mention that Peter is shown more in relation to preaching to the Jews, and Paul preaching to the Gentiles. But even if that were true, it’s not a logical step to say that, because “person A” preached mostly to “group Y”, he was therefore ONLY the Apostle for that group. That’s not only illogical, it’s also unbiblical. According to another person, there is even a Christian group that claims we don't need the rest of the Bible at all , only what Paul wrote, because Paul is “our Apostle” and because, while Paul was converting Gentiles, the Jews rebelled against him, and so he stopped proclaiming to them. Paul did indeed stop preaching to *s...
Comments
Post a Comment