Loraine Boettner’s List – Part 1: Introduction and Praying for the Dead
As I study the Christian faith and its
history, I have found it increasingly important to do 2 things (well,
many, but in this particular case, 2 especially) : 1) find the facts
and 2) correctly represent the position of all sides involved.
Something I have noticed, however, is that sometimes things are
presented as fact, when they really aren’t. Whether it be an
honest mistake (made my share!), or just plain ignorance of an
opposing view (guilty there as well!), or stubborn refusal to really
find out the facts and report them honestly…or anything in between,
facts tend to get, well, misrepresented.
Other examples can be found in the works of the Christina apologist Tertullian, who lived approximately from 155 AD to 250 AD. In his work The Crown (211 AD), Tertullian mentions Christians offering sacrifices for the dead on the anniversary of their death [3], and makes a similar reference in his work Monogamy (213 AD), where he mentions widows offering prayers and sacrifices for their deceased husbands [4].
In the very latest of these two examples, Boettner is still nearly a hundred years off.” (Ariss)
[3] ibid., pg 151.
[4] ibid, pg 158.
(Source for Wayne Ariss' work and brief biography on L. Boettner: http://blackieschurchmilitant-apocalypsis.blogspot.com/search/label/Boettner )
Few things are easier to misrepresent,
I’ve found, than the position of the Catholic Church by
non-Catholics [well-meaning as they may be] who wish to show the
“errors” of “Romanism”.
Wayne A. Ariss wrote a lengthy treatise
titled “Romanism” Revisited: A Factual and Historical
Refutation of the “Boettner List”. In this work, Mr. Ariss
takes Loraine Boettner’s “list” found in the first few pages of
his book “Roman Catholicism” and sets out to address each item,
one by one, to show that 1) not all the facts were considered or
found and 2) the Catholic position was not correctly represented. We
can never know for sure if it was just an honest mistake, or a
hurried attempt to publish the book, or something else. But what we
DO know is that there are many non-Catholics out there who rely on
Boettner’s list for “accurate” information about the Catholic
Church and often use the information in that book to convince
ill-informed Catholics of the “errors” of “Romanism”.
First on the list is praying for
the dead. This also happens to tie directly to item 9 (Purgatory),
so I will address them both here. Boettner says that the Church
invented praying for the dead around 300 AD, and invented the
doctrine of Purgatory in 593 AD. The first thing that should stand
out is, praying for the dead is done BECAUSE of this purgation…this
Purgatory as the Church has called it. So, immediately, before even
examining any further, Boettner has already contradicted his own
claim about the invention of Purgatory.
As Wayne Ariss points out, “The
concept of [temporal punishment for] sins being remitted after death
is found in the Deuterocanonical book of 2Maccabees, 12:38-46, which
was probably written about 124 BC. This is in itself makes Boettner
more than 700 years off the mark, but the Catholic concept of
Purgatory [which I’ll post below, straight from the Catholic
source] still pre-dates Boettner’s claim by hundreds of years”.
(Ariss)
And to be more specific, the concept
praying for the dead dates back to pre-Christianity…to the
Jews…already being mentioned as in passing in 2Macc…so Boettner
is off by much further in my estimation. Now, with that in mind,
let’s look at Boettner’s item number 1…praying for the dead.
Mr. Ariss has already done the
homework, so I’ll quote him again: “The first Scriptural mention
of prayers for the dead occurs in the Deuterocanonical book of 2
Maccabees, chapter 12, verses 39-46, in which Judas Maccabeus and his
men pray for their fallen comrades, that God may forgive the sins of
the dead men. 2 Maccabees was written sometime after 124 BC [1],
which makes Boettner’s date more than 400 years off.
Examples of Christians offering
supplication for the dead are found in grave scripts such as the
Epitaph of Abercius, the Bishop of Hierapolis, written in 180 AD. On
this grave marker, Abercius asks all who may read his marker to pray
for him [2].
Other examples can be found in the works of the Christina apologist Tertullian, who lived approximately from 155 AD to 250 AD. In his work The Crown (211 AD), Tertullian mentions Christians offering sacrifices for the dead on the anniversary of their death [3], and makes a similar reference in his work Monogamy (213 AD), where he mentions widows offering prayers and sacrifices for their deceased husbands [4].
In the very latest of these two examples, Boettner is still nearly a hundred years off.” (Ariss)
[1] Introduction notes to the book of 2
Macc, NAB. New York: Catholic Book Publishing Co, 1969; pg 546.
[2] William Jurgens, The Faith of
the Early Fathers, Volume 1. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical
Press, 1970, pg78.[3] ibid., pg 151.
[4] ibid, pg 158.
Now, what is this “Purgatory” that
we are talking about? What does it actually mean and where does this
belief come from? Contrary to some opinions, it is NOT an
alternative to hell, and it is NOT a second chance, and it is NOT
where someone can be forgiven from any sins. Purgatory is a place,
or process, whereby those who are already saved, yet having the stain
of sins-already-forgiven, are purified before entering into Heaven.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church
says, “All who die in God's grace and friendship, but still
imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation;
but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the
holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven.” (CC C 1030)
“The Church gives the name Purgatory
to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different
from the punishment of the damned. ” (CCC 1031)
“This teaching is also based on the
practice of prayer for the dead, already mentioned in Sacred
Scripture: "Therefore [Judas Maccabeus] made atonement for
the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin."[2Macc
12:46]”. (CCC 1032)
So, what are these Scriptural
references that the Church is referring to? We already looked at
2Macc., but there is also 2Samuel 12:13-14, where David is punished
for his sin AFTER he has been forgiven. And in Heb 12:22-23, Paul
tells us that there is a place or process by which the spirits of
just men are made perfect. We also see in 1Cor 3:13-15 that there is
a place where a saved man, after he has died, can suffer loss as
through fire, and we know that nothing unclean shall enter into
Heaven (Rev 21:27).
Straight from the Bible, then, we see the
Catholic principles for Purgatory: 1) Scripture shows us,
explicitly, that a man can be punished for his sin AFTER he had been
forgiven (2Sam 12:13-18, et.al). 2) Scripture tells us, explicitly,
that there is a place where a man, after he has died, and is saved,
can suffer loss as through fire (1Cor 3:13-15). 3) There is a
place, or process, where the SPIRITS of *just* men are made perfect
(Heb 12:22-23). 4) Nothing unclean can enter Heaven.
Where is this place that Scripture
tells us about, where the SPIRITS of JUST men are made perfect, where
a man, though he is saved, can suffer loss as through fire? Is it
Heaven? No…we don’t suffer loss in Heaven. Is it hell? No….no
one gets out of hell. The Church has given the name “Purgatory”
to this place, or process, where our souls are made clean…because
nothing unclean shall enter Heaven (Rev 21:27).
For more information on the historical
roots of Purgatory:
(Source for Wayne Ariss' work and brief biography on L. Boettner: http://blackieschurchmilitant-apocalypsis.blogspot.com/search/label/Boettner )
Comments
Post a Comment